The ANNEP Journal of Procedural Law, established in 2019, is a semiannual, continuously published, open-access journal with full-text articles, peer-reviewed, and freely available online. The Journal encourages the study and research of National and International Procedural Law and, in the latest journal evaluation, was rated as Qualis B1.

It aims to provide the academic community and legal professionals with contemporary scientific studies on Procedural Law, thereby expanding the space for debate, research, and reflection.

To this end, the magazine publishes articles that undergo the Double-Blind Peer Review process, in which the article is evaluated by Doctors in Law who are unaware of the authors and their evaluators.

At least two ad hoc reviewers (evaluators) conduct the assessment. However, if the discrepancy exceeds three points (on a scale of 0 to 10), a third evaluation will be conducted. It is essential to highlight that the Journal's evaluators are professors from stricto sensu programs across Brazil, recognized by CAPES/MEC.

All approved articles will be registered in the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) system to prevent plagiarism and ensure the longevity of publications, and to facilitate their identification in the digital environment.

The Journal's editorial management was automated through an operational system designed by the “Public Knowledge Project – PKP”. This system is known as "Open Journal Systems (OJS)". The OJS digital platform adopted by the Journal in Brazil is the Electronic Journal Publishing System (SEER), translated and customized by the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology – IBICT.

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Janeiro-Dezembro

Published: 2026-02-16

TWO REFLECTIONS ON THE MULTI-DOOR JUSTICE SYSTEM

Guilherme Christen Möller
001-016
Abstract

This article presents two reflections on the Brazilian Multi-Door Justice System. The first questions the distorted use of self-composition as a response to structural deficiencies in the Judiciary, which undermines its original purpose. The second highlights the system’s democratic potential by allowing greater individual protagonism in building conflict solutions. The central hypothesis is that the system’s effectiveness lies in the adequacy between the dispute resolution method and the...

Read more →

INTERCHANGEABILITY OF PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION overcoming foundational assumptions in judicial review (part 2)

Felipe Dellê
017-035
Abstract

This article examines the interchangeability of procedural mechanisms within judicial review, drawing on Articles 318 (single paragraph) and 327 (§2) of the Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), as applicable to ADI and ADPF proceedings. It asserts that these provisions facilitate procedural fungibility between Laws 9.868/99 and 9.882/99. Although the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) has incorporated such practices into its case law, it has done so without articulating a clear normative...

Read more →

REFLECTIONS ON THE REFORM OF MOZAMBICAN CIVIL PROCEDURE An analysis of the suspensive effect ope legis of the appeal, in light of the principles of effective judicial protection and procedural effectiveness

Neucilto Chapila
036-045
Abstract

The problem discussed in this article lies in the fact that Mozambican civil procedural law grants a suspensive effect ope legis to appeals filed in courts without jurisdiction. The current configuration of appeals, which indiscriminately suspends the effectiveness of all judgments in appeals filed in courts without jurisdiction, allows litigants to abuse appeals as a delaying tactic, even knowing they will not succeed, solely to slow the delivery of justice to the detriment of the...

Read more →

THE ROLE OF PUBLIC ADVOCACY IN PRECEDENT MANAGEMENT

Murilo Teixeira Avelino
046-061
Abstract

The article analyzes the strategic role of Public Advocacy in managing the precedent system, grounded in the constitutional principles of legal certainty and equality. It is argued that public attorneys should act preventively, avoiding the formation of precedents contrary to the Administration through techniques such as tax settlement and waiver of mandatory appeal. In reactive action, binding precedents should be respected or strategically worked towards their overruling. The text seeks to...

Read more →

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IN THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS

Paulo Vitor Faria da Encarnação
062-075
Abstract

The article examines the statute of limitations in the enforcement of judgments, in its material and intercurrent forms. The material statute of limitations, provided for in Article 206, § 5, I, of the Civil Code, applies to attorneys' fees and other liquidated judicial claims, counted from the date of the final judgment. Intercurrent prescription, reinforced by Law 14,195/2021 and by the jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, operates automatically upon knowledge of the absence of...

Read more →

THE INCIDENT OF DISREGARD OF LEGAL PERSONALITY IN THE WORK PROCESS a rereading based on Topic 26 of the TST and Topic 1232 of the Supreme Court

Fábio Porto Esteves, Renata Cristina Othon Lacerda de Andrade
076-091
Abstract

This article deals with the analysis of the institute of disregard of legal personality, an institute of substantive civil law, and the application of the incident of disregard of legal personality in labor proceedings, introduced into the CLT (Consolidation of Labor Laws) with the advent of Law 13.467/2017. In view of the legislative reforms that have occurred in recent years, triggered first by the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure and then by the Labor Reform, as well as the jurisprudential...

Read more →

EXTRA PETITA DECISION CHAPTERS defect and means of challenge

Luiza Farias de Santana
092-106
Abstract

This article aims to examine judicial rulings rendered extra petita. To this end, a preliminary analysis is conducted of the three main categories of defects that may vitiate procedural acts: legal non-existence, nullities, and irregularities. Next, it will explore the available means for challenging tainted judicial decisions, addressing the applicability of the action for nullity and the rescissory action according to the defect to be challenged. Subsequently, it will focus on extra petita...

Read more →
View All Issues